Effective communication is essential for both personal and professional settings. In today’s world, communication can happen through various modalities, such as email/text, voicemail, and face-to-face interactions. However, each of these modes of communication has its strengths and limitations, which can affect the effectiveness of communication.
This brief multimedia clip (Walden University, n.d.) demonstrates these communication modalities being used by a colleague to convey the same information. In the following sections, I will provide my reflection and interpretation of each modality’s effectiveness in conveying the intended message and ways to ensure effective communication with each one.
Email Communication
Email is a common mode of communication in today’s workplace. Emails can be sent and received quickly, and they provide a record of the conversation that can be referred to later. However, email communication can be misinterpreted or misunderstood, leading to confusion or conflict. Tone and context can be difficult to convey through email, and messages can be interpreted differently depending on the receiver’s mood or understanding of the sender’s intent.
The email clip reveals that it is difficult to discern the urgency of Jane’s request from her email’s wording and punctuation. While she acknowledges the pressing need for the missing report, her tone and intent remain somewhat ambiguous, leaving room for interpretation. Additionally, given the possibility of an all-day meeting, Mark may not even receive the email until late in the day, potentially exacerbating any time-sensitive issues. To ensure effective email communication via email, it is important to keep messages concise, use clear language (Walden Univerisity, n.d.), and avoid using slang or abbreviations that may be misunderstood. It’s also important to give clear direction as to what you are asking as the sender, including deliverables and timeline.
Voicemail Communication
Voicemail is another popular mode of communication that is commonly used in both personal and professional settings. However, voicemail messages can be lengthy, and tone and context can be difficult to convey. Furthermore, recipients may not always have the opportunity to respond immediately to a voicemail message, leading to delayed responses or miscommunications.
The voicemail clip conveys Jane’s urgency more effectively than her email. Her urgent tone of voice suggests that the matter at hand is time-sensitive or important. However, a limitation of the voicemail is that Jane’s request for Mark to send over the necessary information in a separate email lacks specific details due to the low brevity of voicemails. This could lead to Mark needing to make a follow-up call for clarification. Moreover, since Mark may have a busy schedule and may not have time to check his voicemail until later in the day, the delay in response time may exacerbate the situation. To ensure effective voicemail communication, it is important to keep messages concise, use clear language, and provide a clear call-to-action for the recipient.
Face-to-Face Communication
Face-to-face communication is often considered the most effective form of communication because it allows for immediate feedback, and tone and context can be conveyed more clearly through body language and facial expressions (Grossman, 2022). Face-to-face communication can also build relationships and trust between individuals, which can be important in professional settings. However, face-to-face communication can also be affected by external factors such as distractions or interruptions or by the relationship between those involved in the conversation.
The face-to-face interaction clip provides a clearer understanding of Jane’s request due to the ability to observe her body language, facial expressions, and tone of voice. This mode of communication also facilitates real-time clarification of any ambiguous details in Jane’s request or enables a discussion among coworkers to address any questions or concerns. Additionally, face-to-face interactions foster a more personal connection, helping to build trust and rapport among colleagues, which can lead to better collaboration and teamwork in the future. To ensure effective communication, it is important to choose an appropriate setting, maintain eye contact, use clear and concise language, and actively listen to the other person’s response.
Advancing technology is transforming the way we communicate, causing a significant impact on face-to-face interactions. With the rise of virtual meetings and teleconferencing, in-person interactions are becoming less common. While technology allows for greater efficiency and convenience, it can also result in decreased personal connections and the loss of nonverbal communication cues that are vital to effective communication (Goman, 2018).
Each mode of communication has its strengths and limitations, which can affect the effectiveness of communication. While email and voicemail are useful tools for quick and efficient communication, face-to-face communication is often the most effective way to build relationships and convey complex messages. It is important to choose the appropriate mode of communication depending on the message’s nature and recipient, and to take steps to ensure that the message is delivered and received effectively. By considering these factors, individuals can improve their communication skills and build stronger relationships with colleagues and clients.
References
Goman, C. K. (2018). Has technology killed face-to-face communication? Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolkinseygoman/2018/11/14/has-technology-killed-face-to-face-communication/.
Grossman, D. (2022). Face-to-face communication: 6 benefits of leading in person. Retrieved from https://www.yourthoughtpartner.com/blog/bid/44390/leading-in-person-6-reasons-to-communicate-face-to-face.
Walden University, LLC. (Executive Producer). (n.d.). Communicating with stakeholders [Video file]. Retrieved from https://waldenu.instructure.com.
HealED Design 
Hi Jill,
As always, I enjoy reading your post! Adding the multimedia clip was a great idea to give readers context to what you were reviewing for this post.
You make a great argument when defending Mark by giving “what if” scenarios and assumptions based on what he may have been doing that day, i.e., an all-day meeting and if he contributed to said meeting, etc. The negative emotion at the beginning of the email was unnecessary because it put additional pressure on Mark to get his report to Jane more hastily than it may not have needed to. In my opinion, voicemail leads to phone tag, where Mark assumes he must reply because she called him first with verbal instructions. It is believed that he should; however, if he did and left another voicemail, would Jane need to call him back? As you have said in your email review, keeping messages concise and with clear direction, i.e., “no need to call me back,” will alleviate this assumption.
I agree 100% regarding your face-to-face review because I feel each person understands better what the other is saying when done face-to-face. Too often, I go to write an email or call to ask for information that starts as a small question but could explode into something more detailed; I try to go to that person (if in the same office space) to ask the question. As you have stated, all three modalities have their strength and weakness; it is all about choosing which method is best for the type of information you need, i.e., completed reports, answers, or additional information.
Was there an experience you have had where one of these three methods of communication started well but ended up needing to be one of the other three? For example, the communication started as an email but needed to be face-to-face.
LikeLike
Hey Jill,
Great read! I enjoyed the layout and breakdown of each communication modality. I agree with Heather on including the media clip – it provides clarity for the readers- communication goal achieved! As Bradley (2014) reiterates, “ context is everything”; without it, communication becomes ineffective. He further advises that miscommunication will likely occur when a message is delivered in one context but received in another.
Each mode of communication has its strengths and limitations. Thus when choosing a communication mode, it is critical to consider the nature of the message, the recipient, and the context. When a message is urgent or complex, having a face-to-face conversation can effectively ensure that the message is conveyed and received accurately. In contrast, if the message is less urgent and requires less context, email may be an appropriate mode of communication.
How can one ensure effective communication in a multicultural workplace where different languages, communication styles, and cultural norms may be present?
Bradley, S. (2014). The Importance Of Context. Vanseo Design. https://vanseodesign.com/web-design/importance-context/
LikeLike
I enjoyed reading your post. I didn’t realize the email and voice mail were so similar until I read your post. They both can lead to back and forth communication with no real progress towards accomplishing action items. Face to face communication is a more open communication and requires all parties to take responsibility for receiving the information that could be immediately put in to action, whereas, email or voicemail may cause some delay.
LikeLike